I understand your concern, but I think the situation is being overstated.
Yes, I acknowledged that tebotb2 is my cousin. However, that does not automatically mean there has been any abuse of admin privileges. All actions taken from the account were based on valid in-game behaviour and supported by evidence. That point still stands and has not been disproven.
You are framing this entirely around “who executed the bans,” but not addressing whether those bans were actually incorrect or unjustified. If any specific ban is wrong, feel free to point it out and have it reviewed, I’m fully open to that.
Regarding account access, I’ve already stated that I’m willing to comply with any official or clearly enforced rule if RGC defines it strictly. At the moment, there seems to be interpretation involved, which is why I’m open to admin clarification rather than assumptions.
The points about VPNs and flags were mentioned only to address incorrect claims being made, they were not the core argument from my side either.
As for the claim that this is purely “system-level” and not personal, it's hard to ignore that several people involved here are closely associated and have had prior in-game conflicts with me. That doesn’t invalidate everything, but it does raise the possibility of bias in how this is being presented.
Also, I’d advise keeping the discussion consistent. Account access concerns should apply equally to everyone if that is the standard being enforced. Singling out one case while ignoring similar behaviour elsewhere doesn’t help the integrity of the system either.
I also want to address the additional concerns raised. The focus continues to shift toward access rather than outcomes. Both are important, but they should be considered together. If no unjustified bans are identified, then claims of “abuse” become questionable.
On accountability, I’ve already made it clear that I welcome a full admin review, including logs, sessions, and timing of actions. That will provide a complete and accurate picture rather than assumptions based on patterns alone.
The points about “behavior patterns” and timing still require proper verification. In active games, actions often follow incidents immediately that in itself does not indicate misuse, but normal moderation in real time.
I agree that fairness and accountability are important, especially for accounts with elevated access. That’s exactly why this matter should be reviewed properly and applied consistently across all users, rather than selectively.
At the end of the day, I’m not avoiding accountability I’m asking for it to be applied based on verified facts. I’m confident that a full review will reflect that no unjustified bans were issued.
Let the admins review the facts and decide.
Thanks <3